Exit Blogs, Enter Social Coverage
The shift
There’s a lot of talk now, about the (r)evolution in blogging: the shift in conversation, the ways we share and (re)distribute, how we find our content.
While I do think blogs will continue to be used for voicing opinions and getting that conversation started, I am convinced that blogging as we’ve known it is over. In my view, a new way of linking, sharing and discusssing has sprung up, following the rise of new social media, which I tentatively call social coverage: I’m not reading your blog, you’re not reading mine, but we’ll end up covering the topic at hand elsewhere nonetheless.
For me, it started with how I read feeds, and couldn’t keep up anymore. What I used to do was: click links, find blogs, subscribe to each one… and then get swamped and not read anything.
But, since a lot of the content from my 644 RSS subscriptions kept showing up on Twitter, Friendfeed or (more recently) Social Median, the question arose: why was I subscribed to them in the first place?
The switch
So, what I’ve done is: get rid of them all, start from scratch, but differently…
First, I consolidated my “social capital” (my Twitter contacts) and started from there. I’ve read other approaches to this over the past couple days, but here’s how I went about it.
- Import my Twitter contacts into Friendfeed (read about that here).
- Delete all my subs from Google (admittedly, I backed them up through Toluu, just in case).
- Subscribe to my Friendfeed and Social Median feeds.
- Add the new Feedly extension to Firefox and let it look for additional content from my social connections, Twitter and Friendfeed.
- Sync feedly with Google Reader
And that’s it. In theory, I now get all the relevant news, shared items, tweets and comments that I need in one place. Also, I’ve made my Google Reader folders for the new Feedly feeds public (thus creating a new publicly available feed for them), and loaded these into the sidebar to the top right here.
The rub
Of course, there are a couple drawbacks.
First off, there is still somewhat of an echo: i.e. I’m seeing a number of doubles, since what Feedly also does is autosubscribe to what it calls people’s recommendations. These are, in fact, Google Reader shared items from my social connections above.
This way, when someone writes something on their blog, I may get to see that item in my Friendfeed feed, in my Social Median feed, and through the items of a third person who shared it in Google. I don’t think there’s a way around this yet, and to be honest, I haven’t played around trying to change this much.
One thing I do like, on Feedly not Google Reader, is the #today page. Whenever I do feel overwhelmed, I just call that up and look at what went on recently and click whatever I feel like following up. This may seem like a very filtered, ad hoc way of receiving information, but as Alexander van Elsas writes:
I see everything as a river of content. It passes by all day long, and whenever I feel like it I dive in. I’m not concerned what I miss when I get out again. The river doesn’t dry up, there is always something else to be found.
The leap
All this then, is what I’d like to call this the next move in blogging. You write and publish, I write and publish, but instead of rubbing each other’s backs commenting on our blogs, we meet halfway. And since your blog or mine doesn’t matter anymore, I no longer need to subscribe and nor do you. Exit blogs, I’d say, and enter social (or networked) coverage.
I’m not sure if this is the way to go or if there are other, better methods out there still. All I know was that I was sick of looking at Twhirl and refreshing my FF and SM pages all day, and that I was getting swamped with content I wasn’t processing anymore.
The buzz
Another drawback is that I’m missing out on content that isn’t voiced on these social sites. A number of the blogs I used to read were of a less techie nature, and those tend to get drowned out in the noise that is the social media buzz.
Obviously, being part of the early-adopter crowd means that the geek minority is overshadowing the silent majority. You should, I suppose, accept that not everyone shares this urge to be online, discussing the internet 24/7.
Or to quote old dog Scoble:
Most people just want to work their 9 to 5 jobs, go home, pop open a beer, sit on the couch, watch some movies, play with their kids, etc.
And that gets me to a final note of caution/critcism: there is an awful lot of meta-talk out there. Because, discussing Friendfeed on Friendfeed, Social Median on Social Median… sometimes you do have to wonder what it’s all about…
The End
But I’m sure this too will slow down after a while. Just like these days not every other tweet is about Twitter anymore, we’ll find ways of using these new media cleverly, and finding out what we want, how we want it.
It’s the way forward, honey.
So, to those who insist on staying on their blogging isles, not joining the conversation, but sitting around waiting for a comment to pop up, there’s this quote of rising star Louis Gray, to which I entirely subscribe:
Blogging 2.0 is about participating everywhere, and understanding that the comments can’t be controlled just on your blog. They’re moving to micro-communities where people are comfortable discussing your content with peers.
I’m not gonna sit around waiting for your comment to appear, but hope to see you halfway.
Nils, you’re wayyyy too far ahead of the majority of computer users
. The “plugged-in” community is still small so this kind of super rapid, distributed approach can work, but most people wouldn’t be able to catch on to this method. I look at my friends and co-workers and I try to explain how a file gets transferred by torrent and see how they don’t get it… I know they won’t be able to come close to keeping up with your vision of the web future.
Then like you say, many of them aren’t interested. However, they needn’t be mentioned.
I’m of the mind that less is more. Our entire web world has to contain as much information as it does currently but in a smaller, easier to use format. The problem of linking and subscribing has to be dealt with but not in a way that simply changes the link destinations, but by eliminating the link entirely (somehow).
August 5th, 2008 at 4:57 pmInteresting experiment
August 5th, 2008 at 7:36 pmGood post and intriguing idea. I subscribed – look forward to more from you.
August 6th, 2008 at 12:51 amTom, eliminating the link is a fascinating concept. It’s what this entire internet thing was based on in the first place and perhaps, somehow, that needs rethinking. It eludes me what that could be though, for now. I’d love to hear more about that though.
Edwin, thanks, and Mark, thank you too. See you around.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:58 amNils,
I like to think that, at least on some levels, I’m moderately socially connected. Then I read through the lists of everything that you’re on, or subscribed to, or a contributor of, and it makes my head spin. I can’t imagine how you manage to get anything done in the way of a job plus all the social media avenues that you’re pursuing, and thinking about diving any deeper into that arena makes me literally glaze over.
Along the lines of what Tom said, I think that this whole plugged-in digital world is going to have to be simplified (somehow) for most people to be able to get their heads around it, much less make it an integral part of their lives. For example, how long did it take people to understand email, and how simple is that concept?
August 12th, 2008 at 4:46 pmWell Joe, seeing how long it took me to reply, you can tell my head is spinning too.
But spinning’s good. It’s good.
In fact, I was missing my old feeds so, that I re-imported my OPML.
Experiment: failed. That is to say: I now have double the amount of feeds.
Soon I’ll be connected to every server on the continent, in the world, and I’ll become omniscient. Nay, immortal! I’ll become the machine that rules the machines!
Ha ha ha!!!
Ha!
August 14th, 2008 at 1:48 pm